but then again, you can't say "this is the quality of a jpeg-image", just as you can't say that with png or gif. It all depends on how much you compress it. jpg is still suitable for many uses and for larger images, but the alpha transparecy is invaluable for webdesign. And statistics don't tell the whole truth, because although 32% of humanity sits on ie6 it doesn't mean that 32% of all your visitors will use it. People who care about design will probably not sit on ie6 for example
__________________
glunge
|